Green Wiki

Human impact on the environment

6,605pages on
this wiki

Human impact on the environment or anthropogenic impact on the environment includes impacts on biophysical environments, biodiversity and other resources.[1][2] The term anthropogenic designates an effect or object resulting from human activity. The term was first used in the technical sense by Russian geologist A. P. Pavlov, and was first used in English by British ecologist Arthur Tansley in reference to human influences on climax plant communities.[3] The atmospheric scientist Paul Crutzen introduced the term "anthropocene" in the mid-1970s.[4] The term is sometimes used in the context of pollution emissions that are produced as a result of human activities but applies broadly to all major human impacts on the environment.[5]



The environmental impact of agriculture varies based on the wide variety of agricultural practices employed around the world.


File:Fishing down the food web.jpg

The environmental impact of fishing can be divided into issues that involve the availability of fish to be caught, such as overfishing, sustainable fisheries, and fisheries management; and issues that involve the impact of fishing on other elements of the environment, such as by-catch.

These conservation issues are part of marine conservation, and are addressed in fisheries science programs. There is a growing gap between how many fish are available to be caught and humanity’s desire to catch them, a problem that gets worse as the world population grows.

Similar to other environmental issues, there can be conflict between the fishermen who depend on fishing for their livelihoods and fishery scientists who realize that if future fish populations are to be sustainable then some fisheries must reduce or even close.[citation needed]

The journal Science published a four-year study in November 2006, which predicted that, at prevailing trends, the world would run out of wild-caught seafood in 2048. The scientists stated that the decline was a result of overfishing, pollution and other environmental factors that were reducing the population of fisheries at the same time as their ecosystems were being degraded. Yet again the analysis has met criticism as being fundamentally flawed, and many fishery management officials, industry representatives and scientists challenge the findings, although the debate continues. Many countries, such as Tonga, the United States, Australia and New Zealand, and international management bodies have taken steps to appropriately manage marine resources.[6][7]


The environmental impact of irrigation includes the changes in quantity and quality of soil and water as a result of irrigation and the ensuing effects on natural and social conditions at the tail-end and downstream of the irrigation scheme.

The impacts stem from the changed hydrological conditions owing to the installation and operation of the scheme.

An irrigation scheme often draws water from the river and distributes it over the irrigated area. As a hydrological result it is found that:

These may be called direct effects.
The effects thereof on soil and water quality are indirect and complex, Water logging and soil salination are part of these, whereas the subsequent impacts on natural, ecological and socio-enonomic conditions is very intricate.

Irrigation can also be done extracting groundwater by (tube)wells. As a hydrological result it is found that the level of the water descends. The effects may be water mining, land/soil subsidence, and, along the coast, saltwater intrusion.

Irrigation projects can have large benefits, but the negative side effects are often overlooked[8][9]

Meat productionEdit

The environmental impact of meat production includes pollution and the use of resources such as fossil fuels, water, and land. According to a 2006 report by the Livestock, Environment And Development Initiative, the livestock industry is one of the largest contributors to environmental degradation worldwide, and modern practices of raising animals for food contributes on a "massive scale" to air and water pollution, land degradation, climate change, and loss of biodiversity. The initiative concluded that "the livestock sector emerges as one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global."[10] In 2006 FAO estimated that meat industry contributes 18% of all emissions of greenhouse gasses. This figure was challenged in 2009 by two World-Watch researchers who estimated a 51% minimum,[11] however this paper has not been peer reviewed.[12]

Animals fed on grain need more water than grain crops.[13] In tracking food animal production from the feed through to the dinner table, the inefficiencies of meat, milk and egg production range from a 4:1 energy input to protein output ratio up to 54:1.[13] The result is that producing animal-based food is typically much less efficient than the harvesting of grains, vegetables, legumes, seeds and fruits for direct human consumption.[13]

Relatedly, the production and consumption of meat and other animal products is associated with the clearing of rainforests, resource depletion, air and water pollution, land and economic inefficiency, species extinction, and other environmental harms.

The author of the influential 2006 Stern Review on climate change has stated "people will need to turn vegetarian if the world is to conquer climate change". This is due to emissions of methane (which is 23 times more potent of a greenhouse gas versus CO2) from cows and pigs via flatulence and eructation.[14]

Palm oilEdit

File:Making palm oil, DR Congo.jpg

Palm oil, produced from the oil palm, is a basic source of income for many farmers in Southeast Asia, Central and West Africa, and Central America. It is locally used as a cooking oil, exported for use in many commercial food and personal care products and is converted into biofuel. It produces up to 10 times more oil per unit area as soyabeans, rapeseed or sunflowers. Oil palms produce 38% of vegetable oil output on 5% of the world’s vegetable-oil farmland.[15] Palm oil is under increasing scrutiny in relation to its effects on the environment.

Energy industryEdit

The environmental impact of energy harvesting and consumption is diverse. In recent years there has been a trend towards the increased commercialization of various renewable energy sources.

In the real world of consumption of fossil fuel resources which lead to global warming and climate change however, little change is being made in many parts of the world. Chinese petroleum demand, for instance, is projected to grow nearly 20% in the next six years, and that country already imports over half of the 8 million barrels a day it uses.[16] If the peak oil theory proves true, more explorations of viable alternative energy sources, could be more friendly to the environment.

Rapidly advancing technologies can achieve a transition of energy generation, water and waste management, and food production towards better environmental and energy usage practices using methods of systems ecology and industrial ecology.[17][18]


The environmental impact of biodiesel is diverse.

Coal mining and burningEdit

The environmental impact of coal mining and burning is diverse.[19] Legislation passed by the US Congress in 1990 required the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to issue a plan to alleviate toxic pollution from coal-fired power plants. After delay and litigation, the EPA now has a court-imposed deadline of March 16, 2011, to issue its report.

Electricity generationEdit

The environmental impact of electricity generation is significant because modern society uses large amounts of electrical power. This power is normally generated at power plants that convert some other kind of energy into electrical power. Each such system has advantages and disadvantages, but many of them pose environmental concerns.

Nuclear powerEdit

The environmental impact of nuclear power results from the nuclear fuel cycle, operation, and the lingering effects of the Chernobyl disaster.

Oil shale industryEdit

File:Kivioli chemical plant.JPG

The environmental impact of the oil shale industry includes the consideration of issues such as land use, waste management, and water and air pollution caused by the extraction and processing of oil shale. Surface mining of oil shale deposits causes the usual environmental impacts of open-pit mining. In addition, the combustion and thermal processing generate waste material, which must be disposed of, and harmful atmospheric emissions, including carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas. Experimental in-situ conversion processes and carbon capture and storage technologies may reduce some of these concerns in future, but may raise others, such as the pollution of groundwater.[20]


The environmental impact of petroleum is often negative because it is toxic to almost all forms of life. The possibility of climate change exists. Petroleum, commonly referred to as oil, is closely linked to virtually all aspects of present society, especially for transportation and heating for both homes and for commercial activities.



The environmental impact of reservoirs is coming under ever increasing scrutiny as the world demand for H2O and energy increases and the number and size of reservoirs increases.

Dams and the reservoirs can be used to supply drinking water, generate hydroelectric power, increasing the water supply for irrigation, provide recreational opportunities and to improve certain aspects of the environment. However, adverse environmental and sociological impacts have also been identified during and after many reservoir constructions. Although the impact varies greatly between different dams and reservoirs, common criticisms include preventing sea-run fish from reaching their historical mating grounds, less access to water downstream, and a smaller catch for fishing communities in the area. Advances in technology have provided solutions to many negative impacts of dams but these advances are often not viewed as worth investing in if not required by law or under the threat of fines. Whether reservoir projects are ultimately beneficial or detrimental—to both the environment and surrounding human populations— has been debated since the 1960s and probably long before that. In 1960 the construction of Llyn Celyn and the flooding of Capel Celyn provoked political uproar which continues to this day. More recently, the construction of Three Gorges Dam and other similar projects throughout Asia, Africa and Latin America have generated considerable environmental and political debate.

Wind powerEdit

File:Wb deichh drei kuhs.jpg

Compared to the environmental impact of traditional energy sources, the environmental impact of wind power is relatively minor. Wind power consumes no fuel, and emits no air pollution, unlike fossil fuel power sources. The energy consumed to manufacture and transport the materials used to build a wind power plant is equal to the new energy produced by the plant within a few months. While a wind farm may cover a large area of land, many land uses such as agriculture are compatible, with only small areas of turbine foundations and infrastructure made unavailable for use.[22]

There are reports of bird and bat mortality at wind turbines, as there are around other artificial structures. The scale of the ecological impact may[23] or may not[24] be significant, depending on specific circumstances. Prevention and mitigation of wildlife fatalities, and protection of peat bogs,[25] affect the siting and operation of wind turbines.

There are conflicting reports about the effects of noise on people who live very close to a wind turbine.

Manufactured productsEdit

Cleaning agentsEdit

The environmental impact of cleaning agents is diverse. In recent years, measures have been taken to reduce these effects.


Nanotechnology's environmental impact can be split into two aspects: the potential for nanotechnological innovations to help improve the environment, and the possibly novel type of pollution that nanotechnological materials might cause if released into the environment. As nanotechnology is an emerging field, there is great debate regarding to what extent industrial and commercial use of nanomaterials will affect organisms and ecosystems.


The environmental impact of paint is diverse. Traditional painting materials and processes can have harmful effects on the environment, including those from the use of Pb and other additives. Measures can be taken to reduce environmental impact, including accurately estimating paint quantities so that wastage is minimized, use of paints, coatings, painting accessories and techniques that are environmentally preferred. The United States Environmental Protection Agency guidelines and Green Star ratings are some of the standards that can be applied.



The environmental impact of paper is significant, which has led to changes in industry and behaviour at both business and personal levels. With the use of modern technology such as the printing press and the highly mechanised harvesting of wood, paper has become a cheap commodity. This has led to a high level of consumption and waste. With the rise in environmental awareness due to the lobbying by environmental organizations and with increased government regulation there is now a trend towards sustainability in the pulp and paper industry.


The environmental impact of pesticides is often greater than what is intended by those who use them. Over 98% of sprayed insecticides and 95% of herbicides reach a destination other than their target species, including nontarget species, air, water, bottom sediments, and food.[26] Pesticide contaminates land and water when it escapes from production sites and storage tanks, when it runs off from fields, when it is discarded, when it is sprayed aerially, and when it is sprayed into water to kill algae.[27]

The amount of pesticide that migrates from the intended application area is influenced by the particular chemical's properties: its propensity for binding to soil, its vapor pressure, its water solubility, and its resistance to being broken down over time.[28] Factors in the soil, such as its texture, its ability to retain water, and the amount of organic matter contained in it, also affect the amount of pesticide that will leave the area.[28] Some pesticides contribute to global warming and the depletion of the ozone layer.[29]

Pharmaceuticals and personal care productsEdit

The environmental impact of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) is largely speculative. PPCPs are substances used by individuals for personal health or cosmetic reasons and the products used by agribusiness to boost growth or health of livestock. PPCPs have been detected in water bodies throughout the world. The effects of these chemicals on humans and the environment are not yet known, but to date there is no scientific evidence that they have an impact on human health.[30]


File:Rio tinto river CarolStoker NASA Ames Research Center.jpg

The environmental impact of mining includes erosion, formation of sinkholes, loss of biodiversity, and contamination of soil, groundwater and surface water by chemicals from mining processes. In some cases, additional forest logging is done in the vicinity of mines to increase the available room for the storage of the created debris and soil.[31] Besides creating environmental damage, the contamination resulting from leakage of chemicals also affect the health of the local population.[32] Mining companies in some countries are required to follow environmental and rehabilitation codes, ensuring the area mined is returned to close to its original state. Some mining methods may have significant environmental and public health effects.


File:45intoI-10 2.jpg

The environmental impact of transport is significant because it is a major user of energy, and burns most of the world's petroleum. This creates air pollution, including nitrous oxides and particulates, and is a significant contributor to global warming through emission of carbon dioxide,[33] for which transport is the fastest-growing emission sector.[34] By subsector, road transport is the largest contributor to global warming.[35]

Environmental regulations in developed countries have reduced the individual vehicles emission; however, this has been offset by an increase in the number of vehicles, and more use of each vehicle.[33] Some pathways to reduced the carbon emissions of road vehicles considerably have been studied.[36] Energy use and emissions vary largely between modes, causing environmentalists to call for a transition from air and road to rail and human-powered transport, and increase transport electrification and energy efficiency.

Other environmental impacts of transport systems include traffic congestion and automobile-oriented urban sprawl, which can consume natural habitat and agricultural lands. By reducing transportation emissions globally, it is predicted that there will be significant positive effects on Earth's air quality, acid rain, smog and climate change.[37]

The health impact of transport emissions is also of concern. A recent survey of the studies on the effect of traffic emissions on pregnancy outcomes has linked exposure to emissions to adverse effects on gestational duration and possibly also intrauterine growth.[38]


The environmental impact of aviation occurs because aircraft engines emit noise, particulates, and gases which contribute to climate change[39][40] and global dimming.[41] Despite emission reductions from automobiles and more fuel-efficient and less polluting turbofan and turboprop engines, the rapid growth of air travel in recent years contributes to an increase in total pollution attributable to aviation. In the EU, greenhouse gas emissions from aviation increased by 87% between 1990 and 2006.[42] Among other factors leading to this phenomenon are the increasing number of hypermobile travellers[43] and social factors that are making air travel commonplace, such as frequent flyer programs.[43]

There is an ongoing debate about possible taxation of air travel and the inclusion of aviation in an emissions trading scheme, with a view to ensuring that the total external costs of aviation are taken into account.[44]


The environmental impact of roads includes the local effects of highways (public roads) such as on noise, water pollution, habitat destruction/disturbance and local air quality; and the wider effects including climate change from vehicle emissions. The design, construction and management of roads, parking and other related facilities as well as the design and regulation of vehicles can change the impacts to varying degrees.


The environmental impact of shipping includes greenhouse gas emissions and oil pollution. Carbon dioxide emissions from shipping is currently estimated at 4 to 5% of the global total, and estimated by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) to rise by up to 72% by 2020 if no action is taken.[45] There is also a potential for introducing invasive species into new areas through shipping, usually by attaching themselves to the ship's hull.

The First Intersessional Meeting of the IMO Working Group on Greenhouse Gas Emissions[46] from Ships took place in Oslo, Norway on 23–27 June 2008. It was tasked with developing the technical basis for the reduction mechanisms that may form part of a future IMO regime to control greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping, and a draft of the actual reduction mechanisms themselves, for further consideration by IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC).[47]


File:'Ranch Hand' run.jpg

As well as the cost to human life and society, there is a significant environmental impact of war. Scorched earth methods during, or after war have been in use for much of recorded history but with modern technology war can cause a far greater devastation on the environment. Unexploded ordnance can render land unusable for further use or make access across it dangerous or fatal.



Human impact on biodiversity is significant, humans have caused the extinction of many species, including the dodo and, potentially, large megafaunal species during the last ice age. Though most experts agree that human beings have accelerated the rate of species extinction, the exact degree of this impact is unknown, perhaps 100 to 1000 times the normal background rate of extinction.[48] Some authors have postulated that without human interference the biodiversity of this planet would continue to grow at an exponential rate.[1]

Coral reefsEdit

Human impact on coral reefs is significant. Coral reefs are dying around the world.[49] In particular, coral mining, pollution (organic and non-organic), overfishing, blast fishing and the digging of canals and access into islands and bays are serious threats to these ecosystems. Coral reefs also face high dangers from pollution, diseases, destructive fishing practices and warming oceans.[50] In order to find answers for these problems, researchers study the various factors that impact reefs. The list of factors is long, including the ocean's role as a carbon dioxide sink, atmospheric changes, ultraviolet light, ocean acidification, biological virus, impacts of dust storms carrying agents to far flung reefs, pollutants, algal blooms and others. Reefs are threatened well beyond coastal areas.

General estimates show approximately 10% world's coral reefs are already dead.[51][52][53] It is estimated that about 60% of the world's reefs are at risk due to destructive, human-related activities. The threat to the health of reefs is particularly strong in Southeast Asia, where 80% of reefs are endangered.

Nitrogen cycleEdit

Human impact on the nitrogen cycle is diverse. Agricultural and industrial nitrogen (N) inputs to the environment currently exceed inputs from natural N fixation.[54][55] As a consequence of anthropogenic inputs, the global nitrogen cycle (Fig. 1) has been significantly altered over the past century. Global atmospheric nitrous oxide (N2O) mole fractions have increased from a pre-industrial value of ~270 nmol/mol to ~319 nmol/mol in 2005.[56] Human activities account for over one-third of N2O emissions, most of which are due to the agricultural sector.[56]

See alsoEdit


  1. 1.0 1.1 Sahney, S., Benton, M.J. and Ferry, P.A. (2010). "Links between global taxonomic diversity, ecological diversity and the expansion of vertebrates on land" (PDF). Biology Letters 6 (4): 544–547. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.1024. PMC 2936204. PMID 20106856. 
  2. David L. Hawksworth; Alan T. Bull (2008). Biodiversity and Conservation in Europe. Springer. p. 3390. ISBN 1402068646. 
  3. Bampton, M. "Anthropogenic Transformation" in Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, D. E. Alexander and R. W. Fairbridge, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
  4. Crutzen, Paul and Eugene F. Stoermer. "The 'Anthropocene'" in International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme Newsletter. 41 (May 2000): 17–18
  5. Scott, Michon (2008). "Glossary". NASA Earth Observatory. Retrieved 2008-11-03. 
  6. Worm, Boris; Barbier, E. B.; Beaumont, N.; Duffy, J. E.; Folke, C.; Halpern, B. S.; Jackson, J. B. C.; Lotze, H. K. et al. (2006-11-03). "Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services". Science 314 (5800): 787–790. doi:10.1126/science.1132294. PMID 17082450. 
  7. Juliet Eilperin (2009-11-02). "Seafood Population Depleted by 2048, Study Finds". The Washington Post. 
  8. Effectiveness and Social/Environmental Impacts of Irrigation Projects: a Review. In: Annual Report 1988, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 18–34 . Download from [1] , under nr. 6, or directly as PDF
  9. Himanshu Thakkar. Assessment of Irrigation in India. World Commission on Dams.
  10. Livestock's Long Shadow – Environmental Issues and Options, Download PDF version, 2006, 390 pp.
  11. World-Watch. World-Watch. Retrieved on 2012-05-11.
  12. Hickman, Martin. (2009-11-01) The Independent. The Independent. Retrieved on 2012-05-11.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 U.S. could feed 800 million people with grain that livestock eat. (1997-08-07). Retrieved on 2012-05-11.
  14. Pagnamenta, Robin (2009-10-27). "Climate chief Lord Stern: give up meat to save the planet". The Times (London). 
  15. "The other oil spill". The Economist. June 24, 2010. Retrieved August 2010. 
  16. Retrieved Aug-23-09. (2009-08-17). Retrieved on 2012-05-11.
  17. Kay, J. (2002). Kay, J.J. "On Complexity Theory, Exergy and Industrial Ecology: Some Implications for Construction Ecology." In: Kibert C., Sendzimir J., Guy, B. (eds.) Construction Ecology: Nature as the Basis for Green Buildings, pp. 72–107. London: Spon Press. Retrieved on: 2009-04-01.
  18. Baksh, B. and Fiksel J. (2003). "The Quest for Sustainability: Challenges for Process Systems Engineering". AIChE Journal 49 (6): 1350. doi:10.1002/aic.690490602. 
  19. Environmental impacts of coal power: air pollution. Union of Concerned Scientists
  20. Bartis, Jim (2006-10-26). "Unconventional Liquid Fuels Overview" (PDF). World Oil Conference. Boston: Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas – USA. Archived from the original on 2007-10-13. Retrieved 2007-06-28. 
  21. Buller, Erin (2008-07-11). Capturing the wind. Uinta County Herald. Retrieved on 2008-12-04."The animals don’t care at all. We find cows and antelope napping in the shade of the turbines." – Mike Cadieux, site manager, Wyoming Wind Farm
  22. Diesendorf, Mark (Summer 2003/04). "Why Australia needs wind power". Dissent 13: 43–48. 
  23. Eilperin, Juliet and Mufson, Steven (April 16, 2009). "Renewable Energy's Environmental Paradox". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2009-04-17. 
  24. Wind farms. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (2005-09-14). Retrieved on 2008-09-07.
  25. Lindsay, Richard (October 2004). WIND FARMS AND BLANKET PEAT The Bog Slide of 16th October 2003 at Derrybrien, Co. Galway, Ireland. The Derrybrien Development Cooperatve Ltd. Retrieved 20 May 2009. 
  26. Miller GT (2004), Sustaining the Earth, 6th edition. Thompson Learning, Inc. Pacific Grove, California. Chapter 9, Pages 211–216.
  27. Tashkent (1998), Part 1. Conditions and provisions for developing a national strategy for biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity Conservation National Strategy and Action Plan of Republic of Uzbekistan. Prepared by the National Biodiversity Strategy Project Steering Committee with the Financial Assistance of The Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and Technical Assistance of United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Retrieved on September 17, 2007.
  28. 28.0 28.1 Kellogg RL, Nehring R, Grube A, Goss DW, and Plotkin S (February 2000), Environmental indicators of pesticide leaching and runoff from farm fields. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. Retrieved on 2007-10-03.
  29. Reynolds, JD (1997), International pesticide trade: Is there any hope for the effective regulation of controlled substances? Florida State University Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, Volume 131. Retrieved on 2007-10-16.
  30. U.S. EPA. Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products. Accessed 16 March 2009.
  31. Logging of forests and debris dumping. (2002-10-17). Retrieved on 2012-05-11.
  32. Poisoning by mines. (2002-10-17). Retrieved on 2012-05-11.
  33. 33.0 33.1 Fuglestvet et al., Center for International Climate and Environmental Research (2007). Climate forcing from the transport sectors.
  34. Worldwatch Institute (16 January 2008). Analysis: Nano Hypocrisy?.
  35. Fuglestvedt, J.; Berntsen, T.; Myhre, G.; Rypdal, K.; Skeie, R. B. (2008). "Climate forcing from the transport sectors". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (2): 454. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702958104. 
  36. Carbon Pathways Analysis – Informing Development of a Carbon Reduction Strategy for the Transport Sector | Claverton Group. (2009-02-17). Retrieved on 2012-05-11.
  37. Environment Canada. Transportation. Retrieved on 30 July 2008.
  38. Pereira, G. et al. (2010) “Residential exposure to traffic emissions and adverse pregnancy outcomes”. ''S.A.P.I.EN.S.'' '''3''' (1). Retrieved on 2012-05-11.
  39. International Civil Aviation Organization, Air Transport Bureau (ATB). Aircraft Engine Emissions. Retrieved on 2008-03-19.
  40. What is the impact of flying?. Retrieved on 2008-03-19.
  41. Travis, David J. (2002). "Contrails reduce daily temperature range". Nature 418 (6898): 601. doi:10.1038/418601a. PMID 12167846. Archived from the original on 2006-05-03. 
  42. "Climate change: Commission proposes bringing air transport into EU Emissions Trading Scheme" (Press release). EU press release. 2006-12-20. Retrieved 2008-01-02. 
  43. 43.0 43.1 Gössling S, Ceron JP, Dubois G, Hall CM, Gössling S, Upham P, Earthscan L (2009). Hypermobile travellers. and Implications for Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction. In: Climate Change and Aviation: Issues, Challenges and Solutions, London. Chapter 6: [2]
  44. Including Aviation into the EU ETS: Impact on EU allowance prices ICF Consulting for DEFRA February 2006
  45. CO2 output from shipping twice as much as airlines. The Guardian (March 2007). Retrieved on 2012-05-11.
  46. Greenhouse gas emissions. Retrieved on 2012-05-11.
  47. SustainableShipping: (S) News – IMO targets greenhouse gas emissions (17 Jun 2008) – The forum dedicated to marine transportation and the environment
  48. "Anthropocene: Have humans created a new geological age?". BBC News. 2011-05-10. 
  49. Coral reefs around the world, 2 September 2009.
  50. In The Turf War Against Seaweed, Coral Reefs More Resilient Than Expected. Science Daily (June 3, 2009). Retrieved on February, 2011.
  51. Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Coral Reefs and Other Marine Calcifiers: A Guide for Future Research (June 2006). Retrieved on February 2011.
  52. Save Our Seas, 1997 Summer Newsletter, Dr. Cindy Hunter and Dr. Alan Friedlander
  53. Tun, K.; Chou, L.M.; Cabanban, A.; Tuan, V.S.; Philreefs; Yeemin, T.; Suharsono; Sour, K. et al. (2004). Wilkinson. ed. Status of Coral Reefs of the world: 2004. pp. 235–276 editorfirst=C.. Retrieved February 2011. 
  54. Galloway, James N.; Aber, John D.; Erisman, JAN Willem; Seitzinger, Sybil P.; Howarth, Robert W.; Cowling, Ellis B.; Cosby, B. Jack (2003). "The Nitrogen Cascade". BioScience 53 (4): 341. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0341:TNC]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0006-3568. 
  55. Galloway, J. N. 2003. The Global Nitrogen Cycle. pp. 557–583 in H. D. Holland and K. K. Turekian (ds.). Treatise on Geochemistry. Pergamon Press, Oxford
  56. 56.0 56.1 Alley et al. 2007. IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I in the Third Assessment Report of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Report Summary for Policy Makers (SPM).

Further readingEdit

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki